Course 2, Week 4: THINK

Butler University’s division of student affairs shared a mnemonic device to use before doing anything on social media on their website. It resonated with me-T=Is it true? H=Is it helpful? I=Is it inspiring? N=Is it necessary? and K=Is it kind? Several times I have noticed my friends and family repost social media news I doubt is true, I might find offensive, or I may not appreciate. Butler recommends we should, “Be critical about what you post, like, and forward. Utilize your research skills to check fact from fiction.” I wish there was a way to get this message out there to my friends and family! Oh wait, I can start by reposting it on my Facebook account:

Butler went on to suggest we should be active bystanders. Active bystander?! This is taking action which is a little less comfortable for me than just sharing an article on Facebook. In the past, I have directed people to when I find something that’s been reposted which is not factual. That part is ok, I’m comfortable with it. However, does this mean I am supposed to tell someone when they are posting information I find unhelpful, uninspiring, not necessary, or unkind? Is my opinion more important or more correct than theirs? Is posting information I find mean just their freedom of speech? I can imagine having this conversation with a student but with an adult-seems sticky. Butler has given me something to ponder and next time I see a post, I will have to THINK carefully about how I will respond and how I can be an effective active bystander.

Famous quote by Pokemon Go Trainer, Hodema; and Pokemon, Butterfree. A visual to help students remember to THINK.

How can I teach my students to critically question what they’re reading online, to question if it is true? My students are at an age when they are learning to read, they are beginning to distinguish between fact and opinion; also, they are learning the difference between fiction and nonfiction. Gaining these understandings is paramount for students to be able to critically question if what they are reading online is true. Seven-year-olds may not yet be ready to fact-check news articles or find original sources for posts online; however, they can begin to hear about the concept of people posting false information online. When we start teaching students about researching online, teachers can give students a consistent message they should consider the possibility someone might have posted misleading information online just to lead them astray, just to mess with them. At this age, teachers can begin to plant the seed of doubt in students’ minds which will lead them to begin questioning the validity of online information. This is the first step for students becoming critical THINKers.

2 thoughts on “Course 2, Week 4: THINK”

  1. Hi Holly!

    I loved reading your post this week because I always talk about THINK with my students. I use it when I talk to them about digital citizenship and in making good choices in life. I even refer to it with my husband sometimes. Haha! This mnemonic device is a simple reminder that we all must THINK before we speak, post, and act.

    I also took some time to look at This is another great resource. With so much “fake news” stories out there, fact-checking information that is put out on there is critical. We can’t believe everything we read or hear. This is a skill that both children and adults need to learn. I also found this list of non-partisan fact-checking sites from Middlebury.

    Thanks for sharing your ideas and resource!

  2. Hi Holly!

    I love that you shared that on your Facebook. I try to keep Facebook for my personal things, and Twitter (@melloluiz2) for my professional things. This is a great example of how the two mix, right? I also mentioned my family and friends in my post! So much misinformation on messaging apps, too.

    I don’t think you have to be the internet police, calling people out and ‘showing them the way’. But at the same time, it doesn’t hurt to ask “where did you get this from?” or follow up with a “oh, look what I’ve found” and the link to a more reliable source, or even a link from a fact-checking page like Snopes:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *